Human Rights and English law (LLB), Discuss why it is that freedom of Essay

Human Rights and English law (LLB), debate why it is that freedom of expression is widely considered to be a fundamental homosexual right, and the extent, if any, t - canvas Examplering protection is not questioned, the degree of immunity accorded to it is a frequently debated issue heretofore as restrictions regarding its protection are concerned, ch each(prenominal)enging its character as a fundamental right. Given the issues meet the freedom of expression, this essay will wherefore argue that the freedom of expression is a fundamental human right, whose protection, although guaranteed, is not absolute such(prenominal) that restrictions must be placed to ensure that its exercise is in abidance with the laws of the land and the responsibilities required of citizens.The freedom of expression is recognised as among the human rights and fundamental freedoms that are the birthright of all human beings (cited in Smith, 2004, p. 1). Its fundamental character lies in its significance as a pillar of classless society, and as a human right intimately connected with the exercise of individual life and liberty. As illustrated in Handyside v. United Kingdom1, the freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society, one of the basic conditions for its progress and for the development of any man, such that its protection is extended not only to information or ideas that are favorably received or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference, but likewise to those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population. Hence, freedom of expression is a fundamental right, whose exercise is necessary for citizens to participate in the democratic process and the functioning of society (Stone, 2004, p.1). On the early(a) hand, the freedom of expression is also a human right whose exercise directly affects other fundamental human rights as recognised by the ECHR. Whereas Article 9 of the ECHR recognises th e freedom of religion, the exercise of such freedom is incomplete if individuals are restricted in their expression of religious beliefs. Freedom of expression is therefore